It might seem peculiar that the definition of "waters of the United States" depends not on science or even custom but on ...
For years, farmers and ranchers have worked their land with a close eye on the weather, volatile markets, farm policy and the ...
A sailor’s long-running fight over a San Francisco Bay island could resolve a Clean Water Act question the US Supreme Court has yet to answer—whether tidal channels and adjacent wetlands qualify as ...
As federal jurisdiction over wetlands shrinks, Alaska must decide whether it has the will and resources to safeguard millions ...
On November 17, the Trump Administration’s Environmental Protection Agency and its Army Corps of Engineers issued a new rule that leading conservation groups say will gut the landmark Clean Water Act ...
Opinion
10dOpinion
‘This Would Have Serious, Real-World Impacts.’ Why the EPA’s Rule Change on Water Protections Would Be a Disaster for Fish and Wildlife
Conservationists are sounding the alarm about the EPA's proposal to strip Clean Water Act protections from many of our streams and wetlands.
The latest WOTUS proposal responds to Sackett v. EPA, aiming to protect clean water while giving farmers and ranchers clearer ...
Enacted in 1969 — before the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act — the National Environmental Policy Act was meant ...
This week, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency heard testimony in Pittsburgh from environmental groups, scientists and industry representatives about proposed changes to the enforcement of the ...
15hon MSNOpinion
The hills will stay alive, for now
In a welcome course correction, the Supreme Court, revisiting its ruling on the definition of the Aravallis suo motu, decided ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback