The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on March 4 that it had sided with the city of San Francisco and against the U.S.

MonitNG urged both the minister and the senator to take immediate action to provide access to clean and safe water, emphasizing ... malfeasance in Africa. Using photos, text, and video dynamically ...

Before federal environmental controls like the Clean Water Act were enacted starting in the 1970s ... and it has an extensive catalog of historic photos. Some of the monochrome shots show long-gone ...

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has signaled it could narrow which set of waters receive protections under the Clean Water Act — and will narrow protections for wetlands in the ...

The Supreme Court dealt another blow to federal environmental protections on Tuesday in a major water pollution case. In a 5–4 ruling in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, the justices ...

streams rivers and lakes – that applied to the federal Clean Water Act as recently as the early years of Joe Biden’s presidency. Farmers and ranchers, among others, might fight it, in part ...

Democrats during a hearing raised questions on the impacts of President Donald Trump’s spending freeze on water infrastructure. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Republicans ...

The U.S. Supreme Court has further eroded the power of the Environmental Protection Agency and state governments to safeguard water quality under the Clean Water Act. In Tuesday’s 5-4 ruling ...

This week’s SCOTUS opinion in City and County of San Francisco v Environmental Protection Agency basically rewrote the Clean Water Act to achieve that result. In this week’s bonus episode for ...