The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has signaled that it could narrow which set of waters receive protections under the ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
8dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
Supporters of SB 601 say the bill is a response to a 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court and to a second Trump ...
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
In a case that centered on unusual alliances and unpleasant descriptions of raw sewage being released into San Francisco Bay ...
The Environmental Protection Agency announced that it will narrow the definition of wetlands, rivers and other waterways that ...
As stated in the Notice of Intent to Sue (NOIS), the laws violated require that no facility shall discharge pollutants to the ...
The 5-to-4 decision is the latest setback for the agency and could have sweeping implications for curtailing water pollution ...
The ruling only prohibits federal and state permitting agencies from issuing permits that are effectively broad orders not to violate water quality standards. In this case, the city and county of San ...
Robin Kundis Craig has been a member of three National Research Council committees on the Clean Water Act and is a member of the American College of Environmental Law and the Environmental Law ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results