The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has signaled that it could narrow which set of waters receive protections under the ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
Supporters of SB 601 say the bill is a response to a 2023 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court and to a second Trump ...
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law’s Robert Weinstock and Alexa Longstaff say there are shortcomings to the Supreme Court ...
The New Republic on MSN8dOpinion
The Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
The Clean Water Act’s ambiguous definition of "waters of the United States" led to a restrictive U.S. Supreme Court ...
On March 4, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court in City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency held that ...
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
The Trump administration announced a wave of regulatory rollbacks on Wednesday including a repeal of Biden-era emissions ...
OpEd: A House committee amendment gives the appearance of reducing the damage that will be done by SB 89, yet still fails to ...
And, because it is enshrining long-standing federal law into the state code, it’s hard to argue that the idea is particularly liberal or conservative. The Clean Water Act was signed by a ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback