A sailor’s long-running fight over a San Francisco Bay island could resolve a Clean Water Act question the US Supreme Court has yet to answer—whether tidal channels and adjacent wetlands qualify as ...
Understand how the proposed WOTUS rule affects farmers, from Sackett v. EPA to regulatory costs, federal jurisdiction and ...
A 2025 poll showed that clean, reliable sources of water beat out inflation and healthcare reform as the top concern for ...
The EPA held a hearing in Pittsburgh on a rule change that would eliminate federal protections for about 80 percent of wetlands.
A new EPA proposal could leave nearly 4 million acres of Louisiana wetlands without federal protection. Here’s what the rule ...
EPA’s new rules, made in conjunction with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, would “fully implement” the Sackett decision, “accelerate economic prosperity” and support the role of states and tribes in ...
Shifting water infrastructure decisions to local governments could accelerate housing, advocates say
The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ proposed new rule redefining “waters of the United States” as a framework for Clean Water Act permitting narrows which ...
- A new federal water rule will focus Clean Water Act jursidiction on relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water. - Critics call the water rule a giveaway to ranchers and ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback