The New Republic on MSN8dOpinion
The Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law’s Robert Weinstock and Alexa Longstaff say there are shortcomings to the Supreme Court ...
On March 4th, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lacks the authority under the ...
The Supreme Court's recent ruling limits EPA's ability to regulate sewage discharge into U.S. waterways affecting water ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that EPA cannot enforce requirements in wastewater permits that “do not spell out what a ...
The dissent, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, suggests that the legal theory of five-vote majority decision was largely of the Court’s own making and contends that its narrow interpretation of ...
But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...
Environmental advocates had accused San Francisco of trying to dismantle the Clean Water Act in a case about the city’s ...
Local News Matters on MSN7d
Ruling in favor of SF stormwater discharge permit casts doubt on clean water standardsA years-long dispute over a San Francisco stormwater discharge permit came to an end Tuesday with a decision by the U.S.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback