Following the Rapanos case, the EPA and ACOE had authority to exercise jurisdiction over wetlands that met either definition. In the Sackett case, the petitioners expressly asked the Court to decide ...

Amigos Bravos project manager Rachel Conn said Largo Wash would likely have been included in the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act even before the 2015 rule because it flows into the San Juan River.

Clean Water Act jurisdiction has always been murky, especially when it comes to wetlands that don’t have direct surface water connections to larger waterways like rivers and streams.

Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Over Waters of the U.S. Redefined Yet Again. by: James M. Auslander, W. Parker Moore, Andrew C. Silton, Jonas A. Reagan of Beveridge & Diamond PC - News & Events.

WOTUS at SCOTUS: Supreme Court Shrinks Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Wetlands. by: William S. Buddy Cox III of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP - Insights and Events. Friday, June 9, 2023.

The US Supreme Court ruled May 25 that regulatory agencies must stop trying to extend the reach of their authority under the Clean Water Act beyond federal waters and adjoining wetlands.

With the political winds at their backs, farm groups and irrigation districts are seeking to ensure the Clean Water Act definition of “waters of the United States” excludes irrigation canals […] ...

He also criticized the administration's claim of Clean Water Act jurisdiction over all interstate waters, regardless of whether they're navigable. We're still waiting on an opinion in the Sackett ...

News High Court Curbs EPA's Clean Water Act Jurisdiction, Reducing Definition of US Waters A fractured decision from the justices reins in the EPA's regulation of wetlands.

On the first day of its new term, the Supreme Court faced a not-so-simple question: At what point does water enter the U.S. government’s jurisdiction?